
I received an interesting comment on my index post for
non-functional requirements, from
leathej1. Below is a short clip.
I just posted something on my site that has been gnawing at me for a few years - the fact that in my mind there is no such thing as a non-functional requirement. As defined in the traditional RUP sense.
A link was provided to
leathej1's blog that contained his rationale. I'm still mulling it over in my mind but his post called,
The Fallacy of Non-Functional Requirements, contains an excellent QA test strategy covering off the testing of "non-functional" requirements. I encourage you to visit his
blog and check it out.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment or provide feedback!